Cricinfo





home


Widgets

Top Performer

Action Replay

Bright Moments

Photos+

Airtel mChek

Help and Feedback


 





Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation






England v South Africa
Australia v Bangladesh
County Cricket
ICC Intercontinental Cup

Current and Future Tours



News
Photos | Wallpapers




Cricinfo Magazine








Match/series archive
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds



Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings




Wisden Almanack



Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout



Daily Newsletter
Desktop Alerts
Toolbar
Widgets







ICC might consider diluting umpires' authority

Match referee could rule on forfeits in future

Cricinfo staff

August 30, 2006



Darrell Hair's actions at The Oval recently could have widespread repurcussions © Getty Images

As a direct fallout of the controversy surrounding the ball-tampering incident and the subsequent forfeiture of the Oval Test between Pakistan and England, the International Cricket Council could decide to take the power of awarding a forfeiture away from the umpire and put that decision in the hands of the match referee.

Sri Lanka have been at the forefront of moving the ICC to make the change, according to a report in The Guardian newspaper, which quotes Jayantha Dharmadasa, the president of Sri Lanka Cricket, as saying, "I think the ICC should discuss whether some decisions, such as ruling that a match had been forfeited, would be better left to match referees than umpires."

Dharmadasa also suggested that there was widespread agreement on this, and that it would not cause a divide in the cricket world. "This should be settled quickly for the good of the game. There will be no split between Asia and the other Test countries on this. I am confident that a settlement will be reached."

Although Darrel Hair, the standing umpire in the centre of the furore, followed the letter of the law, a Test match was forfeited for the first time in the history of cricket. It's widely perceived that this could have been avoided had the match referee stepped in and brokered a compromise.

A standing umpire - involved as closely in the action as he is, with tempers sometimes fraying - needn't always be in the best position to make a decision on a forfeiture. With so much riding on each day's play in this day and age where television revenues dominate cricket as much as they do this raises the stakes even more.

 
Post this story on your favourite website Email this page to a friend Print this page Feedback
Watch our daily Cricinfo SportsCenter news round-ups
Available on Cricinfo.tv
    Add a Cricinfo Widget to your website now!
Cricinfo Widgets
    Live scores, results, news, features and more - a click away
Download the Cricinfo Toolbar

Cricinfo Mobile


Related Links



In Focus

Stories

Players/Umpires






Sponsored Links
Check out all the action only on Tour Diaries
Brought to you by Airtel
Bright Moments
Brought to you by Philips
Gatorade Pacers 2008
Register Now
Follow the new 2008/09 Premier League season
On ESPNsoccernet

Cricinfo Products
Our daily SportsCenter news round-up
Watch on Cricinfo.tv
Add a Cricinfo Widget to your website now
Portable apps for your site



 
Top 5 player searches
Most read stories