Cricinfo





home


Widgets

Top Performer

Action Replay

Bright Moments

Photos+

Airtel mChek

Help and Feedback


 





Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation






Australia v Bangladesh
County Cricket
ICC Intercontinental Cup

Current and Future Tours



News
Photos | Wallpapers




Cricinfo Magazine








Match/series archive
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds



Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings




Wisden Almanack



Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout



Daily Newsletter
Desktop Alerts
Toolbar
Widgets







ICC clarifies rules for inconclusive catches and run-outs

Benefit of the doubt now with the fielder

Cricinfo staff

June 13, 2006



The ICC was forced to act after the incident involving Brian Lara and Mahendra Singh Dhoni © AFP

The ICC has clarified that the benefit of doubt will be granted to the fielder in cases of inconclusive evidence over contact with the boundary rope while completing a catch or effecting a run-out. The clarification follows controversy surrounding Mahendra Singh Dhoni's dismissal on the fourth day of the Antigua Test recently.

According to the protocol, if the on-field umpires are uncertain, they can refer the decision to the third umpire, whose sole responsibility is to decide whether the boundary was scored. However, if the replays are inconclusive, the benefit of the doubt will be given to the fielder, which means that no boundary will be awarded due to lack of evidence. As no boundary has been scored, the only decision left would be for the on-field umpire to give the batsman out caught.

The action was necessitated after Daren Ganga claimed Dhoni's catch at the edge of the mid-wicket boundary but the batsman stood his ground, as there was doubt whether the fielder was touching the boundary rope while taking the catch. However, the TV replays were inconclusive, leading to utter confusion among the players and on-field umpires. Ultimately, Dhoni walked off after Brian Lara told him to take the fielder's word that the dismissal was effected legitimately.

The same rule would apply to inconclusive run-outs, where it is uncertain if the fielder was touching the rope in the pick-and-throw process. Once the third umpire's decision is conveyed to the on-field umpires, they will have to decide whether to refer the run-out as well. In this case, the third umpire could be called to make two separate decisions.

Dave Richardson, the ICC's general manager, explained the reasons for issuing the protocol. "The confusion in Antigua arose over what the third umpire was required to adjudicate on - a boundary or a dismissal", he said. "That confusion created understandable frustration among players and spectators and the clarification of this protocol should ensure a similar situation does not arise in the future."

 
Post this story on your favourite website Email this page to a friend Print this page Feedback
Watch our daily Cricinfo SportsCenter news round-ups
Available on Cricinfo.tv
    Add a Cricinfo Widget to your website now!
Cricinfo Widgets
    Live scores, results, news, features and more - a click away
Download the Cricinfo Toolbar

Cricinfo Mobile


Related Links



Stories

Series/Tournaments

Teams






Sponsored Links
Check out all the action only on Tour Diaries
Brought to you by Airtel
Bright Moments
Brought to you by Philips
Gatorade Pacers 2008
Register Now
Follow the new 2008/09 Premier League season
On ESPNsoccernet

Cricinfo Products
Our daily SportsCenter news round-up
Watch on Cricinfo.tv
Add a Cricinfo Widget to your website now
Portable apps for your site



 
Top 5 player searches
Most read stories