Cricinfo





home Widgets Top Performer Bright Moments Photos Airtel mChek Help and Feedback

 

Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation
India v Australia
Bangladesh v N Zealand
Stanford 20/20 for 20
ICC Intercontinental Cup
ICC WCL Division 4
Indian Cricket League
Current and Future Tours
News
Photos | Wallpapers
Cricinfo Magazine
Match/series archive
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds
Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings
Wisden Almanack
Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout
Daily Newsletter
Toolbar
Widgets



India in Australia 2007-08

Indian players unhappy with Procter findings

Siddhartha Vaidyanathan in Sydney

January 8, 2008



The manner in which Mike Procter handled the hearing has come in for plenty of criticism from the Indians © Getty Images
 

The Indian cricketers, especially the seniors, are said to be deeply dissatisfied with the manner in which Mike Procter handled the ICC hearing and with the official document on it that followed. Procter handed out a three-match ban to Harbhajan Singh, saying he was sure "beyond reasonable doubt" that a racist taunt had been directed at Andrew Symonds, but the Indians have claimed the document was extremely flimsy.

The bit that has especially offended them is a line in the document which says, "I believe that one group was telling the truth". The players felt Procter had alleged they were lying and they didn't think there was any fairness to the verdict. According to the players, the wording in the two-page document was ambiguous and left a scope for counter questions.

The players, according to a member of the side, were also "very upset" with the "rough" manner in which they were treated during the hearing. The hearing, conducted by ICC match referee Mike Procter (assisted by English lawyer Nigel Peters), lasted well over four hours and discussed the two offensive terms "monkey" and "big monkey". There was a series of cross-examinations by both parties, with Symonds making the charge and Harbhajan denying it. Of the four other Australian players who turned up, two (Ponting and Gilchrist) said they had heard nothing.

Meanwhile, the Indians changed their plans on Tuesday, preferring to stay in Sydney rather than travel to Canberra because they wanted to complete the "paper work" with regard to the appeal.

Siddhartha Vaidyanathan is an assistant editor at Cricinfo

 
Post this story on your favourite website Email this page to a friend Print this page Feedback
Watch our daily Cricinfo SportsCenter news round-ups
Available on Cricinfo.tv
    Add a Cricinfo Widget to your website now!
Cricinfo Widgets
    NEW FANTASY: India v Australia Test series - prizes to be won
Enter now - series starts October 9

Cricinfo Mobile


Related Links



In Focus

Stories

Players/Umpires






Sponsored Links
Check out all the action only on Tour Diaries
Brought to you by Airtel
2/3 BHK Homes.Search NOW!
Makaan.com
Bright Moments
Brought to you by Philips
Gatorade Pacers 2008
Register Now
Follow the new 2008/09 Premier League season
On ESPNsoccernet
 
Cricinfo Products
NEW FANTASY: India v Australia Test series
Enter to win prizes
Add a Cricinfo Widget to your website now
Portable apps for your site
 


 
Top 5 player searches
Most read stories