Cricinfo England

home Widgets Top Performer Philips Moments Photos Airtel mChek Help and Feedback



England


News

Features

Photos

Fixtures

County Cricket 2008

2008 Statistics

Domestic Teams

Domestic History

Players/Officials

Grounds

Records

Web Links



 

Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation
India v Australia
Bangladesh v N Zealand
T20 Canada
Stanford 20/20 for 20
ICC Intercontinental Cup
Indian Cricket League
Current and Future Tours
News
Photos | Wallpapers
Cricinfo Magazine
Match/series archive
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds
Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings
Wisden Almanack
Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout
Daily Newsletter
Toolbar
Widgets



The Kookaburra controversy

MCC seek clarification on illegal bats

Cricinfo staff

March 21, 2006



Owais Shah and his controversial blade © Getty Images

The Marylebone Cricket Club, the guardian of the game's laws, is seeking clarification from the ICC over the controversial issue of graphite-backed bats, after a week in which England's debutant, Owais Shah, scored 126 runs with a similar make of bat that Ricky Ponting, Australia's captain, was recently asked to change.

The Kookaburra "Kahuna", which Ponting has stopped using, and "The Beast", which Shah waved in India, have a thin strip of graphite running down the spine, an accessory which contravenes Law 6.1 - "the blade of the bat shall be made solely of wood".

During last week's first Test at Cape Town, Ponting had reverted to a conventional bat, and expressed surprise that Shah had been allowed to play with the graphite-enhanced version.

"He can't use it, he'll be suspended," said Ponting. "It was supposed to be banned as of the 12th of this month, which was the last one-day game the other day. That was all the feedback I received from Kookaburra and everybody else, but guess what I'm using in Durban then!"

Roger Knight, the secretary and chief executive of MCC, felt that without clear guidance from the ICC, umpires were being put in an awkward position. "[The graphite backing] does not strengthen [the bat] but does stiffen it," he told listeners to BBC's Test Match Special, "which probably means it exerts more power."

"The patent application refers to the back of the blade being carbon graphite and, as it says in the laws, the blade must be made solely of wood. We have no authority to tell umpires how to umpire the game but there is quite a lot of questioning of us as to what umpires should do.

"At international level it's very much the ICC which has to implement the law. If they want to put in place a playing condition they are of course entitled to do. We have made our ruling on whether it complies or not - we are waiting for the ICC and other bodies to implement it."

 
Post this story on your favourite website Email this page to a friend Print this page Feedback
Watch our daily Cricinfo SportsCenter news round-ups
Available on Cricinfo.tv
    Add a Cricinfo Widget to your website now!
Cricinfo Widgets
    Fantasy cricket: India v Australia and Bangladesh v New Zealand
Login to check the standings



Related Links



Stories

Players/Umpires

Teams






Sponsored Links
Check out all the action only on Tour Diaries
Brought to you by Airtel
Bright Moments
Brought to you by Philips
Gatorade Pacers 2008
Register Now
Follow the new 2008/09 Premier League season
On ESPNsoccernet
 
Cricinfo Products
South Africa's Makhaya Ntini talks to cricinfo.tv
Watch now (2 mins)
Fantasy cricket - India v Aus & Bangladesh v NZ
Check the standings
 


 
Top 5 player searches
Most read stories