Cricinfo - The home of cricket
  Cricinfo Home   Magazine  
Cricinfo Magazine RSS feed
Opinion | Ian Chappell >>

Opportunity in upheaval

The IPL offers administrators a chance to right some of cricket's wrongs - including the unworkable international calendar


February 17, 2008



The IPL is a wake-up call to teams to ensure they have systems in place that allow well-rounded players like Rohit Sharma to come up the ranks © Getty Images

Before a ball has even been bowled, the controversial IPL concept has already confirmed that money talks: it speaks a language both players and administrators fully understand.

The huge financial inducements being offered by the IPL have resulted in some Australian players locking horns with their board over possibly missing out on a lucrative contract. At least this should curtail any future references to burnout and overwork, as players have shown on more than one occasion that earning money overrides the need for occasional rest.

For their part, cricket administrators worldwide have shown that they are a kite in the wind before the whims of the financially powerful BCCI. If however, the administrators view the IPL concept from the angle of how it can benefit the game, instead of "what is in it for us", they could unearth solutions to some of cricket's problems.

An infuriatingly knotted length of hose has nothing on the current international cricket schedule, but this could be untangled in the process of accommodating the IPL. The Future Tours Program, where every nation plays every other, both home and away, in a six-year period, has proved unworkable. This would be a good time to scrap it and produce an international schedule of mouthwatering variety that is both financially beneficial and meaningful for the players and fans.

As it is currently scheduled, the IPL will conflict with the West Indies international season and the English county programme, and for this year, with the proposed tour of Pakistan by Australia. The latter conflict has the potential to create great paranoia in the present, and the first two, animosity in the future.

The obvious solution would be to sit down and find a window in the international schedule for IPL that suits everybody and in the process tidies up the other programming anomalies that exist.

Another of the major early concerns over IPL is that senior players will eventually favour the concept over playing for their country. The game needs to be continually revitalised by enthusiastic and talented young cricketers, and many selectors are reluctant to blood young players. If the IPL forces senior players to curtail their international careers, the league could fulfil the vital role of providing a natural culling process. However, this will only work if the young players coming through are properly prepared for all forms of the game.

India's talented Rohit Sharma is a good example of a modern well-rounded cricket citizen. He has an excellent batting technique but is also capable of hitting powerful shots, and he is well-schooled in fielding and running between wickets. He has been tutored properly as a youngster and then provided with an environment that allows him to hone all his skills. The fact that he can now adapt those skills to any length of the game is testament to his cricket education.

 
 
If the IPL forces senior players to curtail their international careers, the league could fulfill the vital role of providing a natural culling process. However, this will only work if the young players coming through are properly prepared for all forms of the game
 

If future generations aren't given this sort of complete education and only receive a crash course in cricket, then not only will Twenty20 have a bleak future but so also Test matches and the 50-over game. In the end it is the competitiveness of the teams and the skills of the players that fans come to enjoy, and not even the most elaborate entertainment will overcome a shortage of either.

This is an exciting time for cricket but also a critical period in its history. There are now three forms of the game, all of which have a part to play in the future, but only if far-sighted plans are put in place.

First there was the dilemma of where Twenty20 fit into the overall scheme of things. Then came the upheaval caused by the rebel ICL concept. Now there is the uncertainty over the effect the IPL will have on the game and its scheduling. All three of these upheavals have provided cricket with the perfect opportunity to take a long, hard look at itself and then set about defining the future. However, a satisfactory path for the game's future will only be unveiled if both players and administrators have financial well-being as one of many goals, not the only one.

 Read Comments (14)

 
Post this story on your favourite website Email this page to a friend Print this page Feedback

Comments on this story

Comments have now been closed for this article

Read all 14 comments

Posted by Calavai on February 21 2008, 06:32 AM GMT

I find it funny when cricketers (current, old), administrators and some fans talk about their "national teams", patriotism and national loyalty. The team that calls itself Team India is chosen by a private entity BCCI with no transparency, accountability or most important, say of the Indian public. So the team is really BCCI's eleven - that's it, with an artificial construct they all players hold the same passport. I do not know of other nations but suspect this is the case. Would rather prefer ICLs and IPLs where teams can compete for talent without passport limitations and on an even keel. Better for cricket. As for the format, let those who pay (fans) decide what they want to see as opposed to those who get paid.

Posted by Ash_V on February 20 2008, 17:10 PM GMT

Playing devil's advocate, is it possible for IPL to be a complete flop. Dhoni playing with Hayden and Hussey? Is team spirit possible here? If not the concept is doomed from beginning.

Posted by Sujay_Dallas on February 20 2008, 16:37 PM GMT

On a different note, and with a hindsight, I feel Saurav Ganguly's exclusion for the ODI team was well planned and Saurav might be a party to that. Saurav is presently playing a critical role in forming the Kolkata IPL team. Wonder what SRK would have done with Saurav playing the CB Series being played in Australia! On the success of IPL, I feel it would be hugely successful. But who is paying for it? Finally the money would be coming out from the pocket of consumers and spectators. Also, with the success of IPL, bilateral cricket tours could get affected. I think ICI should try to create a Test World Cup. So three tournaments could get held in future: IPL, ODI World Cup, Test World Cup and may be 4th & 5th ones with Cricket getting included in the Olympics and Asian Games. Thats a prediction - time would tell...

Posted by masterblaster666 on February 18 2008, 09:40 AM GMT

Actually, if the BCCI didn't take such a tough stand on ICL (whereas logically there is nothing else one would expect them to do), IPL itself wouldn't create such a conundrum. Why can't players who play in the rebel league come back to represent the national team....what's wrong if they play for some private club, which is what ICL essentially is. Remember, BCCI's XI doesn't even legally represent the Indian national cricket team, it's a fact. It's plain unseemly coercion. IPL and ICL, together with the domestic structure of all the various countries, have the potential to provide high-quality exposure to upcoming cricketers. As for Twenty20, well even if the crowd wants "only entertainment", only cricketers with strong foundation in the basics will do well ultimately. Even in the T20 Cup, clean-striking Yuvi, Rohit Sharma and Uthappa stole a march over pros England and South Africa...and Harbhajan was tossing it up, something he doesn't do even in Tests these days!!

Posted by AussiDesi on February 17 2008, 21:58 PM GMT

I think the real conflict for players and the boards will come when IPL schedule expands and demands more than few weeks' commitment from players. Only time will tell how things will play out but I have a stinking suspicion that lure of money will thump country loyalty and purity of the game. On the plus side though, Cricket finally seems to be getting the right formula to sell to new countries such as here in U.S.

Posted by Nampally on February 17 2008, 19:36 PM GMT

Ian Chappell's opinions are personal reflection of his foresight. Money always talks in any walk of life. The older super stars will clamour for their share. A 20/20 format may be fun to watch but it is mainly for younger skilled players with fast reflexes & good eye sight. Also the very existence of IPL depends upon milking the Indian fans financially. Is Competing to produce the best city team in India adequate incentive for such high gate fee? As I see it the younger players from Indian cities will learn their game the wrong way and the older super stars will find it challenging in their aging years. Most likely, the fans will find better ways to spend their money than on IPL games, to spell the end of IPL. Hence the real 5 day Tests and ODI's will still be attractive for true cricket fans. Hopefully the ICC and all cricketing countries tailor their incentives to bring them a better brand of cricket to counter IPL decisively. Failure to act now will perish true Cricket.

Posted by honjumark on February 17 2008, 17:50 PM GMT

Over the last decade, there has been a handful of series, both Tests and Odis, that have provided quality cricket as well as tight contests. There is just no way you can ensure competitive matches between countries of varying resources, both human and financial, over any length of time. Add to this equation the future tours program, and you have more mismatches than contests . Clubs are the only way to ensure you have teams that can consistently compete with each other while continually raising the standard of play ( see NBA,EPL,NFL..). If cricket comes before your passport you must support this format. Let it start with 20/20, as soon as mass affinity to clubs has been established, may they move steadily up the ladder to Test Cricket.

Posted by weststigersbob on February 17 2008, 14:17 PM GMT

The only problem I have with the IPL is if it becomes the 'higher' of the cricketing spheres over international matches - something similar to what is happening in European Football. The IPL will give cricket new fans, and more supporters is never a bad thing. 20/20 cricket, like ODI's before them, may seem like an abomination now, but it is proven that batsmen with rock solid techniques thrive in 20/20 cricket more so than sloggers, and bowlers prepared to improvise and mix their skills also do well. Remember, a jaffa is a jaffa in any form of the game, and provided that bowlers don't have more idiotic restrictions placd on them than at present, then 20/20 cricket will have a beneficial, flow-on effect to ODI's and Tests similar to what ODI's had on Tests previously.

Posted by Sanjivwin on February 17 2008, 12:20 PM GMT

Whatever, IC has said is all correct in context of cricket and its longivity but my problem with this is people don't come to see the technique or skills of the cricketers. They just want the entertainment. The other factor is that Twenty20 provides the thrill of anticipating of which team is going to win because of the short nature of the game. On the one side of the coin it provides quick fire of boundries but other side of the coin is the fall of quick wickets with a blink of an eye which one day or test cricket hardly provides. Twenty20 is a seed which has germinated and the plant is rapidly spreading its branches though it requires proper management to gel with one day and test cricket. I think all forms of the cricket will survive but twenty20 may dominate in the short future though time will tell. Sanjiv Gupta Perth Australia

Posted by Aditya_mookerjee on February 17 2008, 12:02 PM GMT

The players and administrators must respect each other, whether they represent the same country, or other countries. We must respect the situation, that cricket is being played, even if we are not playing it. If any effort is true,then it is bound to be appreciated. Let the different leagues accommodate each other, and they will become one. Any effort will bear fruit, even if it is not apparent.

Read all 14 comments

Top

Watch our daily Cricinfo SportsCenter news round-ups
Available on Cricinfo.tv
    Add a Cricinfo Widget to your website now!
Cricinfo Widgets
    NEW FANTASY: India v Australia Test series - prizes to be won
Enter now - series starts October 9
Related Links More by this Writer About this Writer

Latest Features Latest News


Sponsored Links
Check out all the action only on Tour Diaries
Brought to you by Airtel
2/3 BHK Homes.Search NOW!
Makaan.com
Bright Moments
Brought to you by Philips
Gatorade Pacers 2008
Register Now
Follow the new 2008/09 Premier League season
On ESPNsoccernet
 
Cricinfo Products
NEW FANTASY: India v Australia Test series
Enter to win prizes
Add a Cricinfo Widget to your website now
Portable apps for your site
 

 
Top 5 player searches
Most read stories